The federal government has restated its rejection of the marketing campaign from girls who claimed they had been owed billions after their state pensions age was modified.
The Girls Towards State Pension Inequality – WASPI – marketing campaign has lobbied extensively after claiming they weren’t given ample warning of the state pension age for girls being lifted to be in keeping with males.
Having rejected this declare in December 2024, the federal government introduced a review in November final yr when it could take into account new proof.
Politics latest: Starmer’s big China announcement
Campaigners’ argument centres on the declare the change of pension age was carried out too shortly, leaving some girls financially unprepared to deal with the variety of years once they had been not in a position to declare their state pension.
The federal government mentioned in 2024 that they would not be compensated as a result of most girls knew the modifications had been coming, earlier than asserting the evaluate in late 2025.
This evaluate was into a particular declare round how the choice was communicated.
Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden mentioned within the Home of Commons on Thursday that after the evaluate “the federal government has come to the identical conclusion on compensation as… introduced in December 2024”.
He added: “There are respectable and sincerely held views about whether or not it was clever to extend the state pension age, specifically, whether or not the choice taken in 2011 by the coalition authorities to speed up equalisation and the rise to the age of 66 was the precise factor to do or not.”
Learn extra:
Workers being ‘hammered’ while pensioners benefit
Three major pension reforms happening in 2026
Mr McFadden mentioned the evaluate was about “how modifications to the state pension age had been communicated”, not the best way the coverage was determined.
The minister advised MPs: “We settle for that particular person letters about modifications to the state pension age may have been despatched earlier.
“For this, I need to repeat the apology [from former work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall] on behalf of the federal government.
“And I’m sorry that these letters weren’t despatched sooner.
“We additionally agree with the [Parliamentary and Health Service] ombudsman that girls didn’t undergo any direct monetary loss from the delay.”
Campaigners contemplating authorized motion
Angela Madden, the chair of WASPI, mentioned: “This can be a disgraceful political selection by a small group of very highly effective individuals who have determined the hurt and injustice suffered by thousands and thousands of extraordinary girls merely doesn’t matter.
“The parliamentary ombudsman says financial circumstances shouldn’t be used as an excuse to disclaim compensation.
The federal government has magically discovered billions to fund insurance policies not made of their election manifesto, proving cash can shortly turn into obtainable when ministers take into account one thing a precedence.
“WASPI is taking authorized recommendation, and all choices stay on the desk. We stand able to pursue each avenue in Parliament and within the courts to safe the justice that has been so shamefully denied.”
Round 3.6 million girls had been affected by the change to the state pension age.
The federal government has beforehand mentioned compensating them may price £10.5bn.
Girls born between April 1951 and 1960 had been affected.
👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈
The modifications had been first introduced within the 1995 Pensions Act, with a goal to equalise female and male pensions by 2020.
