Retreat from Afghanistan began as a farce, then it was a scandal, now it’s a cover-up

The retreat from Afghanistan in the course of the Taliban takeover in 2021 started as a farce, then it was a scandal and now it is a shoddy cover-up.

The farce was when the then overseas secretary Dominic Raab remained on his vacation sunbed in Crete reasonably than return to work in the course of the top of the evacuation disaster.

Politics newest: Minister sorry after ‘extraordinary secrecy’ concealed data leak

It was a scandal as a result of round 200 folks had been killed within the chaos, with distressing footage of terrified Afghans clinging to the wings of shifting aeroplanes at Kabul airport.

And now we study that in a large cover-up, the Tory authorities of Rishi Sunak took out a superinjunction to gag the media from reporting a knowledge breach that put 20,000 Afghans at risk.

Through the years, superinjunctions granted by UK courts have been condemned for enabling celebrities and sports activities stars to cover-up extra-marital affairs, drug-taking and different secrets and techniques.

The superinjunction granted to the federal government in 2023 to hide a secret scheme to relocate Afghan nationals was clearly totally completely different and little question searched for honourable motives.

However it was a cover-up nonetheless and never so honourable as a result of it hid a knowledge blunder exposing names and make contact with particulars of 18,000 individuals who had utilized for asylum within the UK underneath a resettlement scheme.

The scheme had been arrange by the federal government in 2021 to supply asylum for individuals who had labored with the UK armed forces and could possibly be liable to Taliban reprisals for working with western forces.

Within the Commons, the present defence secretary, John Healey, mentioned it was “deeply uncomfortable” to be prevented from reporting the info breach blunder to MPs till now.

Learn Extra:
‘My family is finished’: Afghan man in UK military data breach says he feels betrayed
Almost 7,000 Afghans being relocated to UK in secret scheme after MoD data breach

The ministers concerned in in search of the gagging order had been the previous defence secretary Ben Wallace and the then armed forces minister James Heappey, he mentioned.

However whereas most MPs welcomed Mr Healey’s apology, it is in all probability honest to say that if it hadn’t been for tenacious campaigning by media organisations the superinjunction may not have been lifted by the Excessive Court docket.

One Tory MP, Mark Pritchard, accused the defence secretary of “wriggling” and mentioned: “The very fact is that he’s justifying this superinjunction and never telling parliament, the press, the general public and, unbelievably, the Afghans who had been doubtlessly in hurt’s manner.”

And, amongst numerous particular person circumstances highlighted by MPs, Liberal Democrat Calum Miller instructed MPs that “within the chaos of withdrawal” a constituent who left Afghanistan was promised by British officers that his pregnant spouse might observe him.

“Two years later, we have now nonetheless not stored that promise,” mentioned Mr Miller. “My constituent’s spouse and baby proceed to maneuver round in Afghanistan to evade the Taliban and my constituent is so determined that he’s speaking about returning to Afghanistan – regardless of the danger to him – to be reunited with them.”

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf hit out on the Tory authorities’s asylum coverage, writing on X: “24k Afghans secretly granted asylum, costing British taxpayers as much as £7bn.

“The federal government coated it up. Who was in authorities? House secretary: Suella Braverman. Immigration minister: Robert Jenrick.”

Later, Mr Healey was requested on LBC’s Information Brokers podcast if the official liable for the info breach remains to be employed by the federal government. “They’re not doing the identical job on the Afghan transient,” he replied.

Hmm. That implies the individual hasn’t been fired, which can alarm these MPs who stay extraordinarily involved about this entire fiasco.

Requested whether or not he would have taken out the superinjunction if he had been defence secretary in 2023, he replied: “Very, impossible.”

However when he was requested if he might rule out the usage of superinjunctions by the Ministry of Defence sooner or later, Mr Healey mentioned: “Effectively, you possibly can by no means say by no means.”

So whereas Mr Healey will clearly be decided to keep away from a farce in future, it seems that the specter of one other Ministry of Defence cover-up in future hasn’t gone away.

Source link