Genetic information strengthens the case that people first settled Sahul round 60,000 years in the past, utilizing a number of seafaring routes.
A big analysis collaboration between the College of Huddersfield’s Archaeogenetics Analysis Group and the College of Southampton’s Centre for Maritime Archaeology has helped make clear when and the way trendy people, Homo sapiens, first settled New Guinea and Australia.
The venture was supported by a European Analysis Council grant awarded to maritime archaeologist Professor Helen Farr on the College of Southampton, with the archaeogenetics analysis led by Professor Martin Richards on the College of Huddersfield.
Over the past Ice Age, decrease sea ranges related New Guinea and Australia right into a single landmass referred to as Sahul. For many years, researchers have debated each the timing of the primary human arrival on Sahul and the migration routes used to succeed in this huge continent.
Bringing collectively experience from archaeogenetics, archaeology, earth science, and oceanography, the brand new research helps make clear who made these early sea crossings, the place they got here from, and once they arrived.
Lengthy versus brief chronology debate
There may be broad settlement that the ancestors of present-day New Guineans and Aboriginal Australians have lived on Sahul for a lot of tens of hundreds of years, with many Aboriginal Australians holding a deep cultural understanding of at all times having been on nation.
Nevertheless, inside Western scientific analysis, the main points of early human dispersal stay contested. Two important timelines have been proposed: the “lengthy chronology,” which locations the primary settlement at round 60,000 years in the past, and the “brief chronology,” which suggests people arrived a lot later, roughly between 45,000 and 50,000 years in the past.
Genetics offers a clearer timeline
The interdisciplinary staff, together with colleagues on the College of Minho in Portugal, at La Trobe College in Australia, and the University of Oxford, focused firstly on human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genomes to address this question. The mtDNA is inherited only from the mother, and the way the mtDNA sequences vary from one person to the next can therefore be used to recreate the maternal genealogy in great detail.
The team analyzed almost 2,500 mtDNA genomes from Aboriginal Australians, New Guineans, and people from the western Pacific and Southeast Asia. They used these to build a genealogical tree and looked at the way the lineages in the tree were distributed from one population to the next. As all DNA changes gradually over time, they used the amount of change in the lineages – known as the “molecular clock” – to date lineages from each region.
Their findings showed that the most ancient lineages seen either in Aboriginal Australians, New Guineans, or both, but nowhere else, dated to around 60,000 years, coming down firmly in support of the long chronology.
The ancestry of the most ancient lineages could be traced back to Southeast Asia. But the team also found that while the majority traced back to more northerly parts of Southeast Asia – northern Indonesia and the Philippines – a significant minority traced to more southerly parts – southern Indonesia, Malaysia, and Indochina. This suggested there were at least two distinct dispersal routes into Sahul with lineages from both routes dated to around the same arrival time.
Significance of research findings
The work is especially significant, as although the new genetic results fit well with the archaeological and paleoenvironmental picture, in the last few years, many geneticists have been moving in the opposite direction, towards a short chronology
Professor Richards said: “We feel that this is strong support for the long chronology. Still, estimates based on the molecular clock can always be challenged, and the mitochondrial DNA is only one line of descent. We are currently analyzing hundreds of whole human genome sequences – 3 billion bases each, compared to 16,000 – to test our results against the many thousands of other lines of descent throughout the human genome. In the future, there will be further archaeological discoveries, and we can also hope that ancient DNA might be recovered from key remains, so we can more directly test these models and distinguish between them.”
Professor Farr added: “This is a great story that helps refine our understanding of human origins, maritime mobility, and early seafaring narratives. It reflects the really deep heritage that Indigenous communities have in this region and the skills and technology of these early voyagers.”
References: “Genomic evidence supports the “long chronology” for the peopling of Sahul” by Francesca Gandini, Mafalda Almeida, M. George B. Foody, Nano Nagle, Anders Bergström, Anna Olivieri, Simão Rodrigues, Alessandro Fichera, Gonzalo Oteo-Garcia, Antonio Torroni, Alessandro Achilli, William Pomat, Zafarina Zainuddin, Ken Khong Eng, Tarek Shoeib, Teresa Rito, David Bulbeck, Sue O’Connor, Jarosław Bryk, Maria Pala, Michael J. Grant, Ceiridwen J. Edwards, Stephen J. Oppenheimer, Robert J. Mitchell, Pedro A. Soares, Helen Farr and Martin B. Richards, 28 November 2025, Science Advances.
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ady9493
“Leveraging known Pacific colonization times to test models for the ancestry of Southeast Asians” by Mafalda Almeida, Francesca Gandini, Teresa Rito, M. George Foody, Andreia Brandão, Marisa Oliveira, Anna Olivieri, Alessandro Fichera, Gonzalo Oteo-Garcia, Zafarina Zainuddin, Ken Khong Eng, William Pomat, Jarosław Bryk, Luísa Pereira, Helen Farr, Maria Pala, Stephen J. Oppenheimer, Martin B. Richards and Pedro Soares, 23 October 2025, Scientific Reports.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-20856-3
The Sahul/Pacific research has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 759677, ACROSS: the origins of seafaring to Sahul (H.F.)
Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.
