TONYA MOSLEY, HOST:
That is FRESH AIR. I am Tonya Mosley. What occurs when a billionaire has extra management over America’s house program than the company that put a person on the moon? Franklin Foer, a employees author for The Atlantic, has written a brand new piece titled “The Man Who Ate NASA.” It traces how Elon Musk, by means of his firm SpaceX, has change into not only a accomplice to NASA however, in some ways, its substitute. Final yr alone, 95% of rocket launches within the U.S. got here from SpaceX. That features missions for the Pentagon, for intelligence businesses and the Worldwide Area Station. And now the ability shift is accelerating. Simply this week, practically 4,000 NASA staff, that is 20% of its workforce, opted to go away beneath the Trump administration’s deferred resignation program. The administration has additionally proposed slashing NASA’s finances.
Foer argues that these strikes sign one thing bigger, the dismantling of NASA as an emblem of American idealism. For many years, the company embodied the idea that by means of public funding and collective effort, we might accomplish the unimaginable. Immediately, Foer writes, that imaginative and prescient has been ceded to personal ambition, and as a replacement is an area program more and more formed by Elon Musk’s obsession with colonizing Mars. Along with being a employees author for The Atlantic, Franklin Foer can be the creator of a number of books, together with “The Final Politician: Inside Joe Biden’s White Home And The Wrestle For America’s Future.”
Franklin Foer, welcome again to FRESH AIR.
FRANKLIN FOER: So nice to be right here.
MOSLEY: So let’s discuss concerning the newest information – 4,000 of NASA’s staff have opted to go away – that is 20% of the workforce – which sounds fairly huge. How vital is that quantity to the general company?
FOER: It is crushing on a number of completely different rounds. The primary is whenever you stroll down the road, you see individuals sporting NASA T-shirts, toting NASA tote baggage. You do not see this for the IRS or the Social Safety Administration. NASA is one thing that conjures up idealism, and it impressed idealism in its workforce. I over the course of reporting this piece, obtained to spend time with quite a lot of NASA staff who had been actually frightened about the way forward for their company within the Trump administration, with all of the looming cuts. And I feel they felt like they might work wherever on this planet. They had been the perfect and the brightest, and but they selected to work at NASA and take a decrease wage as a result of they felt that they had been doing one thing extremely necessary, and so they had been working on this magical group.
And what the finances cuts which have come down on NASA have signaled to these staff is that that idealistic mission will not be going to proceed. It is not going to be this magical place. And I feel quite a lot of staff simply determined relatively than endure by means of this squeezed, cramped mission that is been imposed upon them, the place quite a lot of NASA’s scientific ambitions have been stripped away, they’d relatively go away and go someplace else. And I feel it is actually a tragedy that displays this broader tragedy that is befallen the American authorities, the place we’re simply we’re hemorrhaging all of those people who find themselves extraordinary with their skills and extraordinary in the truth that they determined to dedicate these skills to america, although there have been alternatives within the personal sector that might be rather more profitable for them.
MOSLEY: Since you have talked to so many NASA staff, former and present, I wish to know what this looks like on the within, contemplating, as you mentioned, a lot of them volunteered to go away.
FOER: It is extremely painful. It is anguishing for them. I sat round a desk with a bunch of NASA staff earlier this yr, and so they’d come to Washington to foyer Congress to guard their company, to protect their company. And I simply was so struck by how dedicated and devoted these individuals had been to the concept of NASA and the truth that they really feel like NASA cannot be its outdated self, and that relatively than keep and battle for this factor that they deeply care about, they’re simply going to concede defeat. That to me is simply – it is achingly unhappy to witness.
MOSLEY: I am simply curious, you mentioned that they’ve determined to go different locations, however NASA’s just about a considered one of one in terms of this type of work right here in america. This huge variety of people who’re leaving, they’re everywhere in the nation. The place are they going throughout the personal sector?
FOER: Look, the personal sector is strong. There are specific issues that NASA does that may’t be replicated wherever else, not in academia, not within the personal sector. NASA’s pursuit of science is singular. However there’s a sturdy aerospace neighborhood in america. There are all these firms. Plenty of NASA’s work over time has been handed by means of contractors and center organizations, and so it is potential to go work for these different organizations. A few of the individuals will go to work for SpaceX and work for Elon Musk as a result of it is an thrilling place to work as nicely. There are all kinds of startups in Silicon Valley hoping to capitalize on an rising house economic system. So it isn’t like there will not be different locations to work aside from NASA, however NASA was a spot – NASA is a spot that has a particular sort of idealism that had a particular sort of mission and that was dedicated to sure tasks that actually cannot be replicated elsewhere.
MOSLEY: I imply, Congress has been backwards and forwards. The Trump administration has been backwards and forwards concerning cuts. And I used to be curious, had been these cuts at all times within the DOGE plan, or did Trump make this determination after he and Musk fell out?
FOER: It is attention-grabbing. Should you return and also you have a look at Undertaking 2025, there’s not a chapter dedicated to NASA. And DOGE did not initially descend on NASA. It felt prefer it is likely to be protected territory due to its relationship with Elon Musk. However there are different forces within the Trump administration, and a kind of main forces exists within the Workplace of Administration and Funds, which simply hopes to sort of minimize throughout the board. NASA is attention-grabbing as a result of NASA was engineered, if you’ll, to be a politically impregnable entity that NASA’s workforce is definitely not concentrated in Washington. It is dispersed throughout the nation in any respect of those completely different bases. These bases are linked to politicians who foyer on behalf of jobs which are necessary to their native economic system. There’s this aerospace foyer that is extremely highly effective.
And so there’s a part of NASA that may be very, very onerous to chop, and that a part of NASA that is onerous to chop has really managed to outlive the early Trump period pretty intact. So every thing inside NASA that’s dedicated to human house flight, , kind of persists and in some situations, perhaps even obtained extra funding within the Trump finances within the Huge Stunning Invoice. However there are components of NASA that need to do with science, and people have been hit exceptionally onerous. And so, , we have to mirror on the truth that NASA did all of these items. It is not nearly taking astronauts on the moon or going to Mars, or it isn’t nearly house shuttles, the Worldwide Area Station. It is about telescopes. It is about satellites. What NASA does is it stares again on the planet. It has tracked deforestation. It is tracked local weather change, each of issues that make it susceptible to ideologues on the precise, who wish to shut that down. It stares again into the deepest historical past of the universe. It is impressed youngsters to enter the sciences. These are the components of NASA which are susceptible and which have fallen prey to the Trump finances.
MOSLEY: I wish to get into the ability that Elon Musk holds throughout the U.S. house program, and I wish to quote one thing out of your piece. You say, “as america misplaced confidence in its capacity to perform nice issues, it turned to Elon Musk as a possible savior and in the end surrendered to him.” First off, Franklin, what do you imply whenever you write that the U.S. misplaced confidence in its capacity to perform nice issues?
FOER: We return to the Apollo program, which is absolutely launched within the spirit of ambition on the peak of the Chilly Warfare. It was meant to be this demonstration venture that confirmed that you may get 400,000 individuals, which was the quantity of people that participated in setting up these rockets on the peak of this system, to work in sync to create applied sciences that had by no means been constructed earlier than to go locations that we would by no means gone earlier than. And that was the height of a sure American idealism.
And after the Nineteen Sixties, we continued to go to house. We launched the house shuttle program. But it surely was a sort of zombie program the place we thought we had been doing one thing necessary, however there was no clear aim. We started to outsource quite a lot of our capability to protection contractors, so it wasn’t the federal government really doing this. And If we simply step again and we have a look at this trajectory, it is like, america says it desires to do massive, formidable issues in house, and it invested an enormous amount of cash in doing them, however it wasn’t doing it with a aim that was inspiring. It wasn’t doing it in a manner that demonstrated the competence of the federal government.
MOSLEY: As a result of it had ceded its energy to contractors. And so this brings us to the – early 2000 with Elon Musk. He is simply been pushed out of PayPal as…
FOER: Proper.
MOSLEY: …The CEO. He is obtained cash. He is bored, and such as you write, he is in search of the following massive factor. He even goes to Russia to attempt to purchase missiles. And the way did that wild search then finally lead him to NASA and actually to beginning SpaceX?
FOER: So Musk grew up studying sci-fi, and quite a lot of the sci-fi novels that he learn depicted a hyperrational engineer who swoops in to save lots of society, save humanity from an apocalyptic collapse. And he begins to resolve that he desires to do one thing on this realm of house, and so he goes and he tries to purchase rockets in Russia. A really drunken dinner goes badly. He was clearly being ripped off. And so he decides that he will begin to construct himself. He is very disillusioned when he begins to do that as a result of he thinks, oh, NASA should be on its technique to Mars proper now. After which he goes and appears at NASA’s web site and sees no point out of Mars. And he decides he will do the toughest factor. Now, wealthy individuals are very drawn to house.
MOSLEY: Proper. That is nothing new presently. There are many billionaires who’re investing in know-how, fascinated by making an attempt to be the primary to go up there as a non-public citizen.
FOER: Precisely. As a result of it indicators standing. There is no such thing as a more durable factor than going into house. And so billionaires wish to think about that they will make investments on this pastime and so they can display to the remainder of the world their superiority by doing the toughest, most costly factor. And so Musk units out to do that. And in 2002, he founds SpaceX with this wildly implausible concept that in a suburban Los Angeles warehouse, they are going to cobble collectively their very own rockets.
Now, it is believable to try this as a result of the know-how of rocket engineering would not actually advance that a lot over time. It is only a query of having the ability to do it cheaper, extra effectively than the individuals who did it final. And Musk stumbles in the end on this superb thought of constructing rockets which are reusable. And we’ve got to present Musk and SpaceX their flowers as a result of it’s an incredible firm. He was in a position to determine methods to construct rockets cheaper, extra effectively. If it meant shopping for instruments on eBay to be able to construct a rocket, he was prepared to try this. If it meant reducing steps out of the method, he was prepared to experiment with that – and he was prepared to take dangers that different individuals weren’t prepared to take. And so he failed rather a lot in his early years. And his tolerance for failure meant that he was capable of persevere when others weren’t
MOSLEY: And the federal government at the moment was additionally sort of enamored by this type of move-fast, break-things method of tech entrepreneurs as a result of for years, as you write, they’d sort of been working with different behemoth firms that had their very own bureaucracies to take care of, like Boeing and Northrop Grumman. So I am simply fascinated by that because it pertains to your reference to the Nineteen Sixties and ’70s, the place we had been seeing NASA make errors in actual time and get by means of them. This was one thing that was sort of interesting to the federal government. It is the beginning of why Musk acquired so many contracts early on.
FOER: Proper. So if we consider this as a play in three acts, within the first act, the federal government is ready to develop experience of its personal. Within the second act, it turns to those protection contractors, who’re sort of enmeshed within the army industrial complicated, who’re capable of do massive issues, however they’re additionally clunky bureaucratic entities. After which within the third chapter, the federal government turns to Musk as a result of he’s the scrappy startup who’s the promise of doing issues cheaper, sooner than these protection contractors. And as you say, that is taking place within the 2000s. SpaceX will not be a product of Donald Trump. It is a product of the Bush administration. It is a product of the Obama administration. And of their frustration with the protection contractors and of their want to have one thing service the Worldwide Area Station as they start to retire the clunky program that’s the house shuttle, they’ve to show someplace new.
And Musk and his rockets supply this promise that they will construct and function rockets that may trip between Earth and the house station with out having to depend on these outdated protection contractors, with out the federal government having to construct its personal rockets. The federal government can simply be a passenger on Musk’s rockets.
MOSLEY: Let’s take a brief break, Franklin. Should you’re simply becoming a member of us, my visitor is Franklin Foer, employees author for The Atlantic. His newest story for the September situation is named “The Man Who Ate NASA”. We’ll proceed our dialog after a brief break. That is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
MOSLEY: That is FRESH AIR. I am Tonya Mosley. And as we speak, we’re speaking to Atlantic employees author Franklin Foer. His newest story, “The Man Who Ate NASA,” traces how the U.S. authorities’s deepening dependence on Elon Musk and his firm SpaceX has reshaped the mission and id of America’s house program.
You talked about that final yr, SpaceX dealt with 95% of all rocket launches in america, which sounds additionally like a staggering quantity. However I am making an attempt to place this in context of NASA counting on personal contractors for many years up till that time. Sort of put that quantity in context for us.
FOER: Proper. So this isn’t nearly Musk’s relationship with the federal government. It has to do with the truth that at a sure level within the historical past of his firm, he involves this realization that launching issues into house for the federal government is rarely in the end going to be that worthwhile. It is by no means going to get him sufficient cash to have the ability to do the factor that he goals essentially the most of, which goes to Mars. And so he decides that he will create an organization inside SpaceX the place he will launch satellites which are going to offer web again to individuals right here on planet Earth. And so quite a lot of the satellites that he is launching are a part of Starlink, this firm that he is created that’s a part of SpaceX. And so I feel that that accounts for the massive variety of rockets that he is launching.
However there’s one different factor to be mentioned, which is that a part of SpaceX’s dominance available in the market has to do with the truth that it’s launching stuff on a regular basis, not like different firms. So you’re taking Blue Origin, the Jeff Bezos firm which is theoretically a rival to Elon Musk. He has adopted a sort of a go-slow method the place he would not launch issues all that always. However as a result of Musk and SpaceX are continuously sending issues into house, they’re studying much more than his rivals. They’re gathering all of this knowledge. They’re hiring the perfect engineers as a result of the perfect engineers, , wish to be at a spot the place they’re continuously concerned on this thrilling venture of sending issues into house on a regular basis. And so it is created this virtuous cycle for SpaceX the place due to the quantity of its launches, its dominance simply continues to speed up.
MOSLEY: I imply, Starlink – it appears to be indispensable for the army and for communications functions. A number of years in the past, we had been speaking concerning the conflict in Ukraine. In these early days of the invasion, SpaceX rushed to provide Ukraine with Starlink terminals, serving to them to switch their communications techniques. What makes this alarming is that it looks as if Musk can resolve at any time – proper? – to close down Starlink, and we’re so depending on it. Is the federal government mainly at his mercy?
FOER: I imply, I feel it is in all probability a little bit little bit of an exaggeration to say the federal government is at his mercy. However he is clearly demonstrated that on this one occasion in Ukraine, the place he needed to show off Starlink to be able to form the course of a conflict, he was in a position to try this. It is not simply people speaking, too. It is armies speaking – that house has change into this most necessary area in warfare due to the existence of satellites.
And it is this manner through which Musk’s dominance and the significance of house find yourself simply compounding over time, which is that the extra satellites that we put into house, which change into indispensable to armies speaking with each other, to the flexibility of the federal government to surveil its enemies or to trace ballistic missiles, house simply turns into an increasing number of necessary, which makes SpaceX and Musk an increasing number of necessary. Many of the contracts that SpaceX has with the federal government are, , in the end by means of the Pentagon or the Nationwide Reconnaissance Group. Plenty of them are categorised, so we do not really know the complete element. So it is onerous to essentially wrap our minds round this important place that Musk holds.
MOSLEY: OK. So that you mentioned me saying that the federal government is at his mercy is likely to be an exaggeration. However what would occur proper now if Elon Musk had been like, I am out? You understand, like, if he threatened to drag Starlink satellites or stopped…
FOER: Yeah.
MOSLEY: …SpaceX, like, what would occur?
FOER: Nicely, because it occurs, we’ve got a little bit little bit of a take a look at case right here, which is that Donald Trump and Elon Musk had this bromance, which…
MOSLEY: Yeah.
FOER: …Ended up crumbling. And it crumbled, and really acrimoniously, with all kinds of accusations, the place Trump threatens to presumably deport Elon Musk, who was born in South Africa, the place Musk threatens to cease supplying the Worldwide Area Station. And Trump says, I will minimize off all your contracts. Nicely, the federal government went and so they checked out all of their contracts with SpaceX. And I feel that they decided that they could not actually break up with Elon Musk even when they needed to as a result of they’re so entangled. They’re so dependent. And there’s no actual rival that would exchange the important companies that SpaceX gives.
MOSLEY: Our visitor as we speak is Franklin Foer, employees author with The Atlantic. His newest story for the September situation is titled “The Man Who Ate NASA.” We’ll be proper again after a brief break. I am Tonya Mosley, and that is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
MOSLEY: That is FRESH AIR. I am Tonya Mosley, and as we speak we’re speaking to Atlantic employees author Franklin Foer. In his newest story within the September situation, he traces NASA’s transformation from an emblem of public achievement to a accomplice and now, as Foer places it, a passenger in Elon Musk’s privatized imaginative and prescient for house. This piece is named “The Man Who Ate NASA.” Along with being a employees author at The Atlantic, Franklin Foer can be the creator of a number of books, together with “The Final Politician: Inside Joe Biden’s White Home And The Wrestle For America’s Future.”
Franklin, you open this piece with this fantastical story. It is sort of a sci-fi prophecy about Elon Musk’s identify and a German engineer who was referred to as the godfather of NASA. Are you able to briefly share that story?
FOER: Proper. So Wernher von Braun was this German rocket engineer who labored for the Nazis and was constructing rockets for them utilizing focus camp labor. And america determined that his experience was so priceless that they recruited him. They introduced him right here. They in the end parked him at a base in Alabama, and he started constructing rockets for america. Von Braun was, like Musk himself, very monomaniacal, very obsessive about going so far as we might into house. And actually, the most important prize that engineers like Musk and von Braun think about goes to Mars.
And within the late Forties, von Braun wrote a novel known as “Undertaking Mars,” and he imagines what life could be like on the pink planet, and he describes the federal government that might take maintain on the pink planet. And it is essentially the most weird factor. However when he describes the beneficent dictator who he imagines will run Mars, he provides him a title, and that title is the Elon. And Musk’s father, Errol, I feel, sort of speciously – as a result of I am undecided how he might have discovered about this – likes to say that one of many causes that he bestowed this identify on his son is as a result of he had encountered it on this e book. But it surely’s a very unusual coincidence as a result of I feel Elon Musk, when he thinks about his future, he clearly imagines being the Elon that Wernher von Braun wrote about in his novel.
MOSLEY: What’s his imaginative and prescient of life on Mars?
FOER: First, we should always say life on Mars, objectively, would in all probability be fairly horrible.
MOSLEY: Yeah.
FOER: It is a fully uninhabitable planet. Any individual at his firm confer with it as a fixer-up planet. And that is actually sort of a hilarious understatement as a result of at evening, the temperatures plunge to minus-225 levels Fahrenheit. Should you walked round on the floor of the planet and not using a house swimsuit, your pores and skin would begin to peel off. Inside 30 seconds, your blood would begin to boil. Even when you had been sporting an area swimsuit, we’ve not engineered an area swimsuit that’s hermetically sealed sufficient to forestall radiation and the small particles that exist on the planet from seeping in. Life on Mars could be completely depressing. However for Musk, it could be extremely elegant as a result of it is this opportunity to begin over once more. Yeah.
MOSLEY: You say reengineer humanity.
FOER: It is humorous, when Musk talks on this type of manner, he is echoing a imaginative and prescient that his grandfather had. His grandfather lived in Canada and commenced to fret in very crankish, racist methods concerning the decline of Christian white civilization, and he moved to South Africa to begin over. So this concept of confronting civilizational collapse and going to a brand new place to begin over is baked into the way in which that Elon Musk thinks concerning the world. It’s his inheritance, if you’ll.
And, , he thinks that we might use know-how in a really social Darwinistic technique to create a brand new species. And that is one thing that he talks about in different firms. His firm Neuralink imagines creating direct communication between the human mind and computer systems, which might be this new species, this new cyborg species. And by going to Mars, he is very indirect in the way in which that he talks about it, however he has talked about selectively reproducing to be able to create a species that’s higher tailored to a Martian surroundings. And this isn’t…
MOSLEY: That can be based mostly on his personal picture.
FOER: Precisely. This can be a idea that he really lives in his personal life, that he is very frightened that the individuals who have the very best intelligence aren’t reproducing shortly sufficient. And so he set about doing this in his personal life. He, in accordance with The Wall Avenue Journal, has 14 youngsters unfold throughout at the very least 4 completely different moms, and he is decided to personally do his half to regenerate the species by replicating his personal intelligence.
MOSLEY: There’s additionally this line that is simply very chilling in your piece. You say, he desires to create on Mars a spot the place colonists can be insulated from the ravages of conflict, local weather change, malevolent AI and all of the unexpected disasters that may inevitably crush life on Earth. So it is a very dystopian future that he’s making ready for that’s very like his – as you talked about, his grandfather. He would not use racist language, however this selective engineering signifies that he is speaking a few species that may be very a lot, as you mentioned, in his picture.
FOER: Proper. He is sort of flirting with eugenicist ideas right here. And there is a slippery manner that he has of speaking the place he hints at sure issues. There’s at all times an impish wink when he says a few of these issues as if he is simply saying them to be able to provoke. However the factor that is clear is that this. He is borrowed from science fiction this concept that humanity is doomed, that there is going to be some apocalyptic state of affairs that is going to befall planet Earth. We do not know what it’s. It is likely to be a malevolent AI. It is likely to be local weather change. It is likely to be that the Earth simply abruptly explodes. It is likely to be nuclear conflict. However humanity must create this security valve for itself within the type of a Martian colony. Since we do not know when Earth goes to vanish, we have to urgently start constructing this now to be able to preclude that worst-case state of affairs.
MOSLEY: Let’s take a brief break, Franklin. Should you’re simply becoming a member of us, my visitor is Franklin Foer, employees author for The Atlantic. His newest story for the September situation is named “The Man Who Ate NASA.” We’ll proceed our dialog after a brief break. That is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
MOSLEY: That is FRESH AIR. I am Tonya Mosley. And as we speak, we’re speaking to Atlantic employees author Franklin Foer. His newest story, “The Man Who Ate NASA,” traces how the U.S. authorities’s deepening dependence on Elon Musk and his firm SpaceX has reshaped the mission and id of America’s house program.
You talked concerning the origin of NASA with our President JFK – how initially he wasn’t significantly captivated with house exploration, however modified his thoughts in the course of the Chilly Warfare. The Area Race, as you mentioned, was about world status – a zero-sum competitors with the Russians. I additionally, although, wish to discuss to you about sort of the opposite facet of that as a result of I feel that it truly is necessary to consider, like, the entire different opposing forces of the house program over time. There have been quite a lot of social and political forces within the early ’60s and actual pushback from some People. Are you able to discuss concerning the critique of the house program at the moment? What had been individuals saying about how nationwide sources and a spotlight had been getting used?
FOER: To get to the moon, we spent an insane amount of cash. It was in all probability one thing like $28 billion in Nineteen Sixties cash, which quantities to $300 billion in as we speak’s {dollars}. And there was a phrase that the sociologist Amitai Etzioni popularized, decrying this expenditure, the place he described a moon-doggle. And I feel particularly amongst civil rights organizations, there was a way that this was simply an unjust expenditure as a result of on Earth, there was a lot struggling. And $300 billion and all of that authorities experience, if it had been spent on that struggling, would have finished actual long-term good, versus this ephemeral achievement of getting gone to the moon. And by the point the Seventies roll round, that turns into one thing near an entrenched piece of standard knowledge – that we could not proceed that huge expenditure indefinitely into the longer term.
MOSLEY: In his memoir, Lyndon B. Johnson wrote, quote, “if we might ship a person to the moon, we knew we should always be capable of ship a poor boy to highschool and supply respectable medical take care of the aged.” And what’s outstanding, Franklin, is that imaginative and prescient tied house exploration – it actually did tie it sort of to the broader public good. Immediately that dialog feels very completely different. You talked about Jeff Bezos’ firm Blue Origin. They lately despatched Gayle King and Katy Perry and others on this 10-minute house tourism flight, and Elon Musk is concentrated on colonizing Mars. It seems like a giant departure from the unique spirit of the house program.
FOER: Johnson is absolutely fascinating ‘trigger he views the – sort of the organizational mission of NASA, simply conducting all these tremendously onerous issues, as proof of idea for the Nice Society – that individuals doubted the flexibility of presidency to do massive, formidable issues. However by proving that authorities can do the most important and most formidable factor of all of them, he felt as if he was establishing a template that could possibly be utilized to different areas of American life. And that turned out to be perhaps the empty promise of New Deal, Nice Society liberalism that – , Kennedy would say, we do onerous issues as a result of they’re onerous. And he would speak about how he would bear any burden in a manner that was very round logic. And it wasn’t one thing that we might actively transpose to the home, social, terrestrial realm.
MOSLEY: Franklin, what does the reshaping of America’s house program imply for different applications all through the world?
FOER: So america proper now is definitely engaged in a second Area Race with China. And I feel that that’s the factor that’s driving an enormous quantity of the funding that even the Trump administration is making into NASA – that there is a race proper now to return to the moon to be able to plant a flag there, to get there earlier than China will get there, to have the ability to create some type of everlasting construction there. And I feel that is all being finished in a really completely different tone than the way in which that America engaged within the Chilly Warfare Area Race – that within the Chilly Warfare Area Race, we actually had been making an attempt to show one thing to the remainder of the world about our beneficence, that we got here on behalf of all mankind. And there have been treaties that had been signed that house would not be militarized, house would not be commercialized.
And proper now, on this present Area Race that we’re engaged in the place, , Musk is on the forefront of America’s efforts, we actually are engaged in one thing that’s philosophically fairly completely different – that United States is extraordinarily excited concerning the prospects of commercializing the heavens, of exploiting the heavens for uncommon earth minerals, for unlocking the commercial prospects of house. That in terms of militarization, we actually do wish to set up dominance within the heavens. That we perceive that the following huge conflict could possibly be fought in house. So relatively than creating this literal house above us the place there was the likelihood that we might do higher than we had finished on our personal planet, we’re merely replicating quite a lot of the worst components of what we have finished to this planet. And we have ceded any sense that there could possibly be this utopian risk for ethical evolution within the heavens.
MOSLEY: Are we headed in direction of a future the place your complete house program is privatized?
FOER: Once you have a look at the preliminary finances that Donald Trump submitted and the applications that he needed to cancel, there would have been some extent within the not-so-distant future the place america authorities was not engaged in proudly owning and working vessels that would take us to house, and that there could be a interval the place every thing would part out and the one believable entity left could be SpaceX. And over the horizon, whenever you have a look at the priorities for the American house program, we will return to the moon. That is taking place. That is a venture SpaceX is concerned in, however it’s not completely a SpaceX program. However in terms of attending to Mars – which is the factor that the president dedicated to in his inaugural tackle, and it is now a bipartisan piece of American coverage because it pertains to house – there’s actually just one particular person, one firm that is creating the vessel that will get us to Mars, and that’s SpaceX. It is Starship. It should be essentially the most highly effective rocket ever constructed. And he hasn’t demonstrated that it is absolutely operable but, however he is making use of the complete sources of his firm to make it occur, and he is nearly prepared it into existence.
And when that occurs, whether or not the federal government is on board with this system of attending to Mars or if it is only a Musk-driven factor, there can be this vessel that may journey to Mars. And will probably be owned by Elon Musk and operated by Elon Musk. And NASA and america generally is a passenger on that rocket if it so chooses. And if it chooses to not be a passenger on that rocket, then, , there’s this risk that Musk might independently attempt to construct this colony on Mars absent authorities help or blessing.
MOSLEY: You understand, given how uninhabitable Mars is, I imply, how significantly ought to we take each Musk’s ambitions and doubtlessly the U.S. authorities’s ambitions to go there?
FOER: Proper now, it isn’t technologically believable – proper? – for us to get to Mars. Musk has not constructed a rocket that’s able to doing it. To ensure that a flight to Mars to occur, we’ve got to attend for the orbits of the planets to align so that it is the shortest distance between the 2 orbs ‘trigger in any other case, it turns into implausible. It requires an excessive amount of gas, it requires – and even then, it could take eight months to get from Earth to Mars. I discover the concept of colonization to be wildly implausible. It is under no circumstances engaging to me. That mentioned, human beings pursue wildly implausible ends to be able to fulfill utopian goals on a regular basis. And so I take significantly this concept that Musk is pursuing it and that he is doing so doubtlessly with sturdy backing from america.
MOSLEY: Franklin Foer, thanks a lot on your reporting, and thanks on your time.
FOER: Thanks.
MOSLEY: Franklin Foer is a employees author for The Atlantic. His new story seems within the September situation. It is known as “The Man Who Ate NASA.” Developing, rock critic Ken Tucker commemorates the fiftieth anniversary of the discharge of George Clinton’s album, “Mothership Connection.” That is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF PRINCE SONG, “DELIRIOUS”)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.
