Reeves says it was her job to be at PMQs supporting authorities, however ‘clearly I used to be upset’
Rachel Reeves has mentioned “clearly I used to be upset” when requested about being tearful throughout PMQs yesterday, PA Media reviews. Nevertheless it was her job to be at PMQs “supporting the federal government and that’s what I attempted to do”, she mentioned.
Reeves additionally appeared to reject ideas that her tears had been associated to a dialog with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle or one other member of presidency.
Requested whether or not this was the case, the chancellor informed broadcasters:
No, it was a private difficulty, and I’m not going into the main points of that. It wouldn’t be proper or truthful. Individuals noticed I used to be upset, however that was yesterday. At present’s a brand new day and I’m simply cracking on with the job.
My job as chancellor is to return the steadiness to the economic system, convey funding into Britain, however most significantly to enhance the lives of atypical working individuals, which is why I’m so happy that on this first 12 months rates of interest have come down 4 occasions, saving cash for individuals with mortgages, I’ve been the chancellor who’s elevated the nationwide dwelling wage… so I’m happy with what we’ve completed this final 12 months.
However is there extra to do as a authorities? Completely there may be, and I’m going to get on with that job.
Key occasions
-
Green peer Jenny Jones tells peers it is wrong to view Palestine Action as terrorist group
-
Peers debate order banning Palestine Action as terrorist group
-
Government hopes to open up to 50 new neighbourhood health centres by end of this parliament, Streeting tells MPs
-
Labour peer David Lipsey found dead after swimming in River Wye
-
Steve Reed says some farms to be devoted to nature, not food production, under land use plan
-
Ofsted chief says getting rid of single-word school ratings will have impact on house prices
-
Starmer outlines 10-year plan to change NHS ‘from sickness service to health service’
-
Jeremy Corbyn hints at launch of new party as leftwing alternative to Labour
-
Starmer says last year’s tax-raising budget did ‘lot of heavy lifting’, but declines to say this year’s won’t be similar
-
Reeves confirms ‘cost’ of welfare bill U-turn will be ‘reflected in budget’
-
Reeves says she is ‘totally’ up to being chancellor in interview intended to show she’s recovered from ‘tough day’ at PMQs
-
Reeves says it was her job to be at PMQs supporting government, but ‘clearly I was upset’
-
Streeting publishes 10-year health plan for England
-
Starmer sidesteps question about whether Trump should address parliament on his state visit
-
Starmer rejects suggestion pressure becoming too much for Reeves
-
Starmer again declines to rule out tax rises in autumn budget
-
Starmer: NHS plan only possible because of decisions by Reeves
-
Starmer says NHS app to be transformed as part of 10-year plan, so it becomes ‘doctor in your pocket’
-
Reeves speaks at launch of 10-year NHS plan, defending fiscal rules, and without reference to yesterday’s PMQs
-
Streeting praises Reeves, as she speaks at launch of 10-year NHS plan
-
Farage says he would like to have ministers in Reform UK cabinet who weren’t MPs or peers
-
Streeting says he wants to expand access to weight-loss drugs on NHS
-
Starmer accepts blame for welfare fiasco and says No 10 ‘didn’t get process right’
-
Starmer says reasons for Reeves being tearful at PMQs were ‘purely personal’ and ‘nothing to do with politics’
-
Starmer says he will ‘reflect’ on welfare bill fiasco, but claims government ‘will come through it stronger’
Right here is John Crace’s sketch on Wes Streeting, Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer on the launch of the NHS plan this morning.
Inexperienced peer Jenny Jones tells friends it’s flawed to view Palestine Motion as terrorist group
Jenny Jones, the Inexperienced occasion peer, has tabled a movement to remorse as an modification to the Palestine Motion order. It might add these phrases to the movement passing the order.
however this home regrets that the proscription of Palestine Motion as a terrorist organisation (1) undermines civil liberties, together with civil disobedience, (2) constitutes a misuse of anti-terrorism laws, provided that offences comparable to property harm will be handled beneath different prison regulation, (3) suppresses dissent in opposition to the UK’s coverage on Israel, and (4) criminalises assist for a protest group, thereby making a chilling impact on freedom of expression.
In addition to banning Palestine Motion, the order additionally bans Maniacs Homicide Cult (MMC) and the Russian Imperial Motion, two white supremacist teams.
She informed friends that Palestine Motion weren’t in the identical class as this group.
She mentioned that the present definition of terrorism consists of property harm with a view to cowl actions which could not be violent in themselves, however which may, in a contemporary society, “have a devastating affect”.
However this didn’t apply to what Palestine Motion do, Jones mentioned. She mentioned their actions didn’t have the potential to trigger “a devastating affect”, and their actions haven’t concerned “a sample for critical violence”, she mentioned.
She went on:
If you need Palestine Motion to vanish, then cease sending arms to Israel and giving army assist to a international authorities engaged in ethnic cleaning.
There are numerous issues Palestine Motion has completed I don’t agree with, however spraying paint on refuelling planes that campaigners consider are used to assist the ethnic cleaning in Gaza is just not terrorism. It’s prison harm, which we have already got legal guidelines for.
Friends debate order banning Palestine Motion as terrorist group
Yesterday MPs voted to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.
The order proscribing the group must be handed by the Home of Lords too, and within the Lords David Hanson, a Residence Workplace minister, has simply opened the talk on this.
He harassed that the federal government was not banning “the professional marketing campaign for Palestinian rights and statehood which has existed in our nation and certainly throughout each Homes of Parliament for greater than 5 a long time”. And it was not banning protests in assist of Palestine, he mentioned.
He mentioned the federal government defended the fitting of individuals to interact in peaceable protest. However that didn’t contain giving this group “a clean cheque for this explicit group to significantly harm property or topic members of the general public to worry and violence”.
He went on:
Palestine Motion has orchestrated a nationwide marketing campaign of property harm, that includes assaults which have resulted in critical harm to property and crossed the edge from direct prison motion into terrorism,
Palestine Motion members have used violence in opposition to individuals responding on the scene of assaults for his or her function in coordinated assaults. Members of the organisation have been charged with critical offences, together with violent dysfunction, grievous bodily hurt with intent, aggravated housebreaking, which is an offence involving a weapon.
Regardless of a few of the rhetoric on the contrary, the group’s personal supplies have acknowledged that the organisation is just not peaceful. That is echoed within the actions of its members who’ve dedicated atrocious assaults.
On the idea of all of the proof, the house secretary, Yvette Cooper, and the safety minister, Dan Jarvis, have concluded the group must be proscribed, he mentioned.
Authorities hopes to divulge heart’s contents to 50 new neighbourhood well being centres by finish of this parliament, Streeting tells MPs
Right here is the text of Wes Streeting’s assertion to MPs that he delivered earlier concerning the authorities’s 10-year plan for well being in England.
And listed here are a few of the factors that got here up throughout the exchanges.
-
Streeting mentioned that the federal government anticipated to open round 40 to 50 new neighbourhood well being centres by the top of this parliament, and as much as 300 over the subsequent 10 years. In response to a query about who would run them, he replied:
They are going to be NHS suppliers and we’ll be doing a mix of recent builds and likewise refurbishing and rejuvenating underutilised current property each within the NHS and within the public sector, and subsequently the price of every neighbourhood well being centre will differ from the low thousands and thousands to round £20m relying on whether or not it’s an improve, a refurb, an enlargement, or certainly a brand new construct.
-
He mentioned that the federal government can be utilizing personal finance for some capital initiatives, notably in neighbourhood well being. However it will do that “with care and warning, and preserving in thoughts the errors that had been made by the personal finance initiative”.
-
Edward Argar, the shadow well being secretary, questioned how the measures can be applied, however mentioned the plan “by and huge does say the fitting issues”. In response, Streeting thanked Argar for his constructive method and mentioned Argar was “relatively extra critical and smart than the show we noticed from the opposition yesterday”.
Labour peer David Lipsey discovered useless after swimming in River Wye
The Labour peer David Lipsey has been discovered useless after swimming within the River Wye, PA Media reviews.
Dyfed Powys Police confirmed the physique of a person pulled from the River Wye in Glasbury on July 1 is that of Lord Lipsey, PA says. Lord Lipsey, who beforehand labored as a journalist and Downing Road adviser beneath then prime minister Jim Callaghan, entered the Lords in 1999.
A police spokesperson mentioned:
Dyfed-Powys Police acquired a report in regards to the security of a person who was final seen swimming within the River Wye, Glasbury. Following a multi-agency search on July 1, sadly, we will affirm the physique of Lord David Lipsey was recovered. His subsequent of kin have been knowledgeable and our ideas are with them at this troublesome time. They’ve requested for his or her privateness to be revered.
After Brexit many Britons utilized for Irish citizenship so they might retain an EU passport. A British passport doesn’t supply the identical journey rights, but it surely does produce other benefits and the Residence Workplace says in a news release “Irish individuals dwelling within the UK will quickly be capable to apply for British citizenship beneath a brand new simpler, cheaper route”.
Steve Reed says some farms to be dedicated to nature, not meals manufacturing, beneath land use plan
Helena Horton
Helena Horton is a Guardian surroundings correspondent.
Some farms will probably be taken fully out of meals manufacturing beneath plans to create space for nature, the surroundings secretary has mentioned.
Talking on the Groundswell farming competition in Hertfordshire, Steve Reed mentioned a revamp of the submit Brexit farming subsidies and a brand new land use plan will probably be geared toward rising meals manufacturing in the best areas and lowering or fully eradicating it within the least productive. In actuality, this implies many upland farmers could also be incentivised to cease farming.
He mentioned his land use framework “envisions taking a few of the least productive land out of meals manufacturing, however supporting the extra productive land to extend manufacturing.”
Reed added that is so “you keep outputs, and even improve outputs whereas rising the house for nature.”
He went on:
We have now a restricted quantity of land on this nation for the numerous calls for we we make of it, for meals manufacturing, for housing, for vitality and for nature, and we have to make it possible for we’re utilizing them optimally for all of these outcomes.
He added that these communities will probably be supported by way of the transition.
I grew up within the 80s, and the Thatcher authorities on the time destroyed the trade that my total household labored in, and nothing was put in place. So these communities had been destroyed, and like for my complete life, one of many causes I bought concerned in politics was to make it possible for can’t occur once more.
Ofsted chief says eliminating single-word college rankings could have affect on home costs
Richard Adams
Richard Adams is the Guardian’s training editor.
Sir Martyn Oliver, the top of Ofsted, has urged that home costs in England might be affected by the federal government’s modifications to highschool inspection grading that put off rankings comparable to “excellent”.
Throughout a session at an training competition in Berkshire, Oliver associated how home costs close to the place he lived “shot up” by £15,000 in every week after a close-by college was graded excellent, and mentioned: “Dad and mom clearly put a price on it.”
Oliver mentioned the elimination of single-term grades comparable to excellent, good or insufficient by the federal government posed a “burning query” for property web sites comparable to Rightmove, which prominently embrace native college grades of their listings.
Oliver mentioned:
We’re about to take that away and alter it to one thing else that for greater than three a long time individuals had been used to. I imply, right here’s the burning query, what’s Rightmove going to do? It’s a critical level.
Ofsted has been criticised for overcomplicating its reforms to highschool gradings – a Labour manifesto dedication on the final election that adopted the suicide of headteacher Ruth Perry following a traumatic Ofsted inspection that downgraded her college from excellent to insufficient. At Perry’s inquest, the courtroom heard of her fears that the grade would harm native home costs and anger dad and mom.
Requested by John Dickens, the editor of Colleges Week, what affect the brand new “report card” grades would have on home costs, Oliver replied:
I don’t know however I do know that the place I dwell … we’ve bought two particular measures colleges proper the place I dwell, And the home costs shot up, they had been each in particular measures, each went excellent, and the home costs went up £15,000 in every week. It does make a distinction…. Dad and mom clearly put a price on it.
Starmer outlines 10-year plan to vary NHS ‘from illness service to well being service’
Right here is our up to date story by Peter Walker and Denis Campbell concerning the launch of the 10-year well being plan for England.
Jeremy Corbyn hints at launch of recent occasion as leftwing different to Labour
Jeremy Corbyn has hinted he might launch a political occasion alongside different leftwing impartial MPs in an try to supply “another” to Labour, earlier than the subsequent normal election, Aletha Adu reviews.
A reader asks:
@andrewsparrow in your submit concerning the ‘why are you so ineffective?’questions. What’s the precise worth on this line of questioning? No engagement in substance and received’t get something good out of politicians
That may be a reference to the submit at 12.24pm.
That may be a truthful query. There are lots of people within the media who fear that ‘Why are you so garbage?’ questioning simply perpetuates a false narrative that politicians are largely or at all times corrupt or dishonest or ineffective.
However there are at the very least two good the explanation why this type of interviewing will be justified. First, there are lots of instances the place broadcasters can say their viewers need to see politicians interrogated like this, as a result of these are the cruel questions viewers can be asking if that they had the possibility. And, second, in an period the place politicians routinely default to pre-scripted solutions, questions that provoke them out of their consolation zone typically produce a greater solutions than predictable ones.
On this event I believe Beth Rigby achieved that. In response to the bit about why he didn’t discover Rachel Reeves’s misery yesterday, Starmer gave a protracted, and fairly fascinating and convincing, rationalization as to why at PMQs he by no means has time to note what’s going on round him as a result of it’s simply “bang, bang, bang”. (See 11.17am.) And in response to the assault on his report, he got here out swinging, defending the federal government’s report extra robustly than he normally does.
Starmer says final 12 months’s tax-raising finances did ‘lot of heavy lifting’, however declines to say this 12 months’s will not be related
Final 12 months, in a Q&A on the CBI convention, Rachel Reeves mentioned that after the 2024 finances she would was “not coming back with more borrowing or more taxes”. That’s typically quoted as Reeves rolling out any additional tax rises, however the truth is anybody who heard the total Q&A could have understood that she was ruling out was future tax rises on the dimensions of what was in that finances. She additionally informed the CBI: “We received’t must do a finances like this ever once more.”
The finances raised taxes by £25bn in 2025-26, and by virtually £42bn by 2029-30.
Till not too long ago, ministers have been blissful to repeat that model of the Reeves promise – to say that the 2024 finances was a one-off, and that the federal government won’t ever give you tax rises that huge ever once more.
However this morning, when Gary Gibbon from Channel 4 Information requested Keir Starmer if he was nonetheless keen to rule out tax rises “something like” these within the 2024 finances, Starmer didn’t fairly give that pledge. (See 11.20am.) Starmer replied:
To begin with, let me say what each prime minister or chancellor says anytime they’re requested a couple of future finances – it’s at all times the identical, thisn’t a Labour reply or Conservative reply – no prime minister or chancellor goes to put in writing a finances upfront.
However we did actually robust stuff in that finances final 12 months. We made positive we stabilised the economic system, and we took huge choices early on …
So I say once more at present, we’ve completed lots of the heavy lifting, we’ve completed lots of the laborious yards. The results of that, we’re turning our economic system round, quickest development within the G7 within the first quarter of this 12 months, enterprise confidence at a nine-year excessive and report funding.
In the long run, that’s what drives development. That’s what we had been saying a 12 months in the past, the opposite aspect of the election. And that’s what I’ll say it once more right here at present.
Right here some footage of Rachel Reeves, Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting on the launch of the 10-year well being plan on the Sir Ludwig Guttman Well being & Wellbeing Centre in east London this morning.
Right here is Beth Rigby, Sky Information’ political editor, take on Rachel Reeves’ efficiency this morning.
CX got here to NHS speech to indicate she was again in enterprise however then did pool clip after not answering Qs put to her at occasion. All of this try to reassure markets. For all criticism she’s had politically appears traders view her as final defence from the spending hungry left
