A century after a well-known trial that centered on the instructing of evolution, science continues to be on the middle of contentious public debates.
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
This week marks the a hundredth anniversary of the Scopes Monkey Trial, formally often called the State of Tennessee vs. John Thomas Scopes. Scopes was a instructor accused of breaking a Tennessee legislation that prohibited classes on human evolution. And all the nation was riveted. NPR’s Nell Greenfieldboyce studies on why this well-known trial nonetheless resonates at this time.
NELL GREENFIELDBOYCE, BYLINE: The Scopes Trial was fictionalized within the play “Inherit The Wind,” which grew to become a traditional film in 1960. It opens with somber city leaders, together with a badge-wearing lawman, marching into a faculty.
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “INHERIT THE WIND”)
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #1: (As character) For our science lesson for at this time, we’ll proceed our dialogue of Darwin’s idea of the descent of man.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: There, in entrance of the scholars, the instructor was arrested.
(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “INHERIT THE WIND”)
UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR #2: (As character) You are charged with violation of Public Act 31428, quantity 37, statute…
GREENFIELDBOYCE: The fact was nothing like that. The Scopes Trial was a very contrived occasion dreamed up by civic leaders in Dayton, Tennessee, who had been chatting at a drugstore soda fountain. They’d learn within the newspaper that the American Civil Liberties Union was on the lookout for a check case to problem the brand new state legislation, and so they figured, why not get our city some publicity? So the top of the college board despatched for a 24-year-old substitute instructor, John Scopes, and requested him, will you allow us to use you for this?
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
JOHN SCOPES: And I stated, effectively, OK.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Scopes recalled that second in an interview with radio legend Studs Terkel. Within the archival tape, Scopes stated inside half-hour of his agreeing to the plan…
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
SCOPES: It was on the wires out of Chattanooga…
STUDS TERKEL: That you just had been arrested.
SCOPES: …That I used to be arrested.
TERKEL: However had you taught on the college?
SCOPES: Properly, I had taught a category in biology for about three or 4 weeks.
EDWARD LARSON: Scopes had by no means taught evolution, and no one thought he did.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: That is Edward Larson, a historian with Pepperdine College. He says what was referred to as a trial was actually extra of a staged public debate. Famed lawyer Clarence Darrow volunteered to defend Scopes. The function of prosecutor went to the well-known populist William Jennings Bryan.
LARSON: You had two magnificent orators in Bryan and Darrow making their arguments, backed up by a legion of supporters, who’re additionally articulate, on either side.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: This was the primary trial ever broadcast on radio. 1000’s of newspapers adopted the story. It is turn into a part of American folklore. Larson says lots of people at this time assume that Scopes gained.
LARSON: (Laughter) That is the largest false impression.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: In truth, the jury deliberated for lower than 10 minutes and located him responsible. Either side claimed an ethical victory, however Larson says should you learn newspaper editorials from 1925, they principally simply marveled at how the nation was divided and the way it appeared like this divide would persist. To Ken Ham, this division is the inevitable results of essentially totally different world views. He is the founding father of Solutions in Genesis, the Creation Museum and the Ark Encounter in Kentucky. He as soon as debated evolution with science educator Invoice Nye. Ham believes that creationism versus evolution is actually about who we’re, the place we got here from, the aim and which means of life.
KEN HAM: If there’s a god who created us, and it’s the God of the Bible, then he determines proper and improper and good and evil, and we’ve an absolute authority. However if you’re simply the results of pure processes, and there’s no God, who determines proper and improper? Who determines good and evil?
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Many People, nonetheless, see no battle between their non secular beliefs and human evolution. Kenneth Miller is a biologist and a training Catholic who cowrote a broadly used biology textbook. Its emphasis on evolution acquired it embroiled in a few courtroom instances. He sees actual progress in getting evolution taught and accepted.
KENNETH MILLER: After a few years of the American public being 50/50 on evolution, we now have a considerable majority saying they settle for evolution when it comes to the evolution of the human species.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Nonetheless, in a Pew Analysis Middle survey launched earlier this 12 months, 17% of People stated that they believed, quote, “people have existed of their current type because the starting of time.” And Miller says he continues to see efforts to cease or affect the instructing of human origins in addition to different contentious science topics like local weather change and vaccines.
MILLER: Final 12 months, West Virginia handed a legislation that permits the introduction of so-called various theories with respect to controversial matters in science courses.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Some say this legislation was supposed to open the door to classroom discussions of creationism, however not like the legislation on the middle of the Scopes Trial, Miller says it hasn’t been examined in courtroom. Nell Greenfieldboyce, NPR Information.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
